DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 7 of 7

1
Citation: Dabrowska, Ewa (2011) Who is afraid of constructivism? (¿Quién tiene miedo del Who is afraid of constructivism?
In: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/5057/1/whoisafraidofconstructivism.pdf (2011)
BASE
Show details
2
Productivity, proceduralisation and SLI: Comment on Hsu and Bishop
In: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/4630/1/productivityproceduralisationandsli.pdf
BASE
Show details
3
Words as Constructions
In: http://www.cogling.group.shef.ac.uk/publications/words%20as%20constructions%20final.pdf
BASE
Show details
4
Naïve v. expert intuitions: An empirical study of acceptability judgments
In: http://www.cogling.group.shef.ac.uk/publications/Naive%20v%20expert.pdf
BASE
Show details
5
Individual differences in native language attainment: A review article 1
In: http://www.cogling.group.shef.ac.uk/publications/Ind_diffs_review.pdf
BASE
Show details
6
Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 7 (2009), 277–290
In: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/389/1/constructingasecondlanguage.pdf
BASE
Show details
7
More Individual Differences in Language Attainment: How much do adult native speakers of English know about passives and quantifiers?
In: http://www.cogling.group.shef.ac.uk/publications/More%20individual%20differences.pdf
Abstract: This paper provides experimental evidence suggesting that there are considerable differences in native language attainment, and that these are at least partially attributable to individual speakers’ experience. Experiment 1 tested high academic attainment (hereafter, HAA) and low academic attainment (LAA) participants ' comprehension using a sentence-picture matching task. Test sentences comprised passives and two variants of the universal quantification construction. Active constructions were used as control. HAA participants performed at ceiling on all conditions; LAA participants performed at ceiling only on actives. As predicted by usage-based accounts, the order of difficulty of the four sentence types mirrored their frequency. Experiment 2 tested whether the less educated participants ’ difficulties with these constructions are attributable to insufficient experience. After a screening test, low scoring participants were randomly assigned to two training groups. The passive training group were given a short training session on the passive construction; and the quantifier training group were trained on sentences with quantifiers. A series of post-training tests show that perfommance on the trained construction improved dramatically, and that the effect was long lasting.
Keyword: English passive construction; How; Individual differences; Linguistic competence; Linguistic performance 1 More Individual Differences in Language Attainment; Sentence comprehension; Universal quantification
URL: http://www.cogling.group.shef.ac.uk/publications/More%20individual%20differences.pdf
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.215.4165
BASE
Hide details

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
7
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern